OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek R1: The Reasoning Models
Table of Contents
Until 2024, LLMs (like GPT-4) were “probabilistic parrots” with flashes of brilliance. They answered instantly, relying on pattern matching. The new generation, led by OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek R1, introduces a fundamental change: Time to Think.
🐢 System 1 vs System 2
Psychologist Daniel Kahneman distinguishes between two modes of thinking:
- System 1: Fast, instinctive, emotional. (GPT-4o, Gemini Flash).
- System 2: Slow, deliberative, logical. (OpenAI o1, DeepSeek R1).
Reasoning models force the AI to use System 2. Before answering, they generate an internal Chain of Thought (CoT).
User: “Create a regex for emails that excludes domains ending in .biz”
Standard Model: (Instantly writes a regex that might fail on edge cases).
Reasoning Model: (Thinking…)
- “I need to match standard email format.”
- “I need a negative lookbehind for .biz.”
- “Wait, regex lookbehinds are tricky in some engines. Let’s check constraints.”
- “Let’s test with ‘user@company.biz’…” -> Final Answer: (A robust, tested regex).
🥊 o1 vs R1
OpenAI o1 (Preview/Mini)
- Pros: Incredible logic capability. Solves PhD-level physics problems and complex refactorings.
- Cons: Expensive. Slow. High latency makes it bad for chatbots, great for offline agents.
DeepSeek R1
- Pros: Open Weights! You can run it (or distilled versions) locally. Very efficient.
- Cons: slightly behind o1 in extreme complexity, but rapidly closing the gap.
🛠️ When to use them in Android Dev?
DON’T Use Reasoning Models for:
- “How do I center a text in Compose?” (Overkill, slow).
- “Write a commit message.”
DO Use Reasoning Models for:
- Architecture Design: “Review my Clean Architecture layer boundaries for circular dependencies.”
- Complex Debugging: “Here is a race condition in Coroutines involving 3 flows. Trace the deadlock.”
- Refactoring: “Convert this God Activity to MVVM, splitting logic into UseCases.”
🎯 Conclusion
We are moving from “Search Engines that chat” to “Reasoning Engines that code”. For complex engineering tasks, latency is a price worth paying for correctness.
You might also be interested in
DeepSeek R1: The New Contender in AI Coding
A comprehensive review of DeepSeek R1 for coding tasks. How does it compare to GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet in Android development?
Reasoning Models (o1, R1): Why Prompt Engineering is Dying
The arrival of OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek R1 marks the end of complex 'Prompt Engineering'. Understand how reasoning models (System 2) work and when to use them.
agents.md: The New Standard for AI Development
Discover why agents.md has become the de facto standard for configuring AI agents and how to effectively implement it in Android projects.